Independent site. Not the official Pat Finucane Review, the UK Government, the Finucane family or any inquiry. The official 2012 report is published on GOV.UK.

Finucane Case Reviewan independent guide

Reader's guide · Volume I, chapter 24

Chapter 24: Stevens I and the Nelson prosecution, a reader's guide

Official title: The Stevens I Investigation and the prosecution of Brian Nelson

In brief

  • The Army and RUC Special Branch deliberately obstructed Stevens I; senior Army officers lied to investigators.

What this chapter covers

Chapter 24 examines the first investigation led by Sir John Stevens, which began in September 1989, and the prosecution of Brian Nelson that followed.

Key findings

  • De Silva found that the Army and RUC Special Branch deliberately obstructed the Stevens I investigation.
  • He found that senior Army officers "deliberately lied to criminal investigators" about the Army's running of agents.
  • The chapter examines leaks connected with the investigation and briefings that, the report found, gave a misleading picture of Nelson's role.
  • It considers how Nelson's 1992 prosecution and plea were handled, including representations made on his behalf.

Why it matters

Obstruction of an investigation is a separate wrong from the original crime, and this chapter documents it in detail. It is the basis for some of the strongest language in the Prime Minister's statement on 12 December 2012. See also our guide to the Stevens 2003 overview.

Sources

  1. GOV.UK: The Report of the Patrick Finucane Review (HC 802, 12 December 2012)
  2. Irish Times: Cameron statement on de Silva report
  3. Hansard, House of Commons, 12 December 2012: Patrick Finucane Report
  4. Statewatch: analysis of the de Silva report by Paddy Hillyard and Margaret Urwin